Talk:Operation Raindance

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Operation Raindance article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Operation Raindance appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 January 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Operation Raindance was followed by a Stranglehold?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Operation Raindance.

Wikipedia

Military history: National / Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Southeast Asia: Laos

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Laos (assessed as Low-importance).

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments[edit]

I have some issues with the neutrality of the proposed DYK. I have not gone through it in great detail, but examples include;

Hmong General Vang Pao not only suffered the reverses of his failed offensive, and the loss of a forward airfield at Muong Soui; his defensive position was soon further weakened' by Vietnamese communist attacks.[5] The communist wet season offensive was unprecedented in Laos. Now, faced with the looming possibility of a final guerrilla defeat, American Ambassador William H. Sullivan

Sorry but that sounds rather non-neutral (not quite 'encyclopaedic) - it seems to be giving an interpretation on the facts, not just stating them.

I also highlight faced with the looming possibility because the phrase is more descriptive than encyclopaedic; I hope you see what I mean. It is better (in the encyclopaiedia) to just state facts, and let readers draw their own conclusion about their significance; not to offer interpretation.

Igor the bunny (talk) 21:12, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This plaint seems to be aimed at the article, not the actual DYK. I have returned to the article to tweak it a bit, in the interests of NPOV. However, if an event has never previously occurred, is it not unprecedented? Georgejdorner (talk) 23:42, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]