Talk:Optoelectronics

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Electronics High‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

The photon[edit]

The Photon: I put the branchlist template on this page because it is in the Electronics category and so seems to me to form a branch of Electronics. While it might seem odd that it has no branches of its own this is alright, and I see the value of the template as allowing folk looking through the field of electronics to quickly get here, and then back into the main subject. This page has 'long range' links to quantum physics, which is fine. I put Optoelectronic devices off the main Electronics page in alongside Passive devices and Active devices as their are a lot of devices and they seemed best grouped in that way. I don't claim to have finished the job though, and happily leave that to others. I just wanted to show a possible solution to the problem of fragmented big topics. -Lindosland 00:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your branchlist seems to be unmaintainable. Please don't test in live articles. --Wtshymanski 00:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removed section[edit]

I must not have saved my comments here yesterday. Sorry about that.

I removed the section because I am wondering if this is not a round about way to advertise for the company to which this section was linked (in the text). It seems to me that this section needs additional references or citations from other third party reliable sources that support the content. Even published research results that reflect the content will do. I can't see having only one commercial entity, directly linked in one of the paragraphs as the only source. Please discuss: ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum mechanical effects of light?[edit]

Reference 1 is a dead link.

In addition, I don't believe all aspects of studies and applications of optoelectronics involve quantum mechanical effects of light - on the contrary, many modern photonics engineering applications are based on classical electrodynamics, despite the word "photon" is used on a rather abusive frequency. For a reference, see http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01135846 Das schtig (talk) 23:48, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Photon: I put the branchlist template on this page because it is in the Electronics category and so seems to me to form a branch of Electronics. While it might seem odd that it has no branches of its own this is alright, and I see the value of the template as allowing folk looking through the field of electronics to quickly get here, and then back into the main subject. This page has 'long range' links to quantum physics, which is fine. I put Optoelectronic devices off the main Electronics page in alongside Passive devices and Active devices as their are a lot of devices and they seemed best grouped in that way. I don't claim to have finished the job though, and happily leave that to others. I just wanted to show a possible solution to the problem of fragmented big topics. -Lindosland 00:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[edit]

M 2409:4042:E88:389:0:0:A64B:3402 (talk) 08:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Paul Vigario[edit]

LED concern In-frared Concern Gun law concern

Also: Matthew Vigario

tampering of DNA 107.242.121.5 (talk) 18: 29, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Jennifer Giuliani[edit]

Tampering with DNA In-frared Concern Light Concern Smuggling identity theft projects 107.242.121.5 (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TAMPERING WITH DNA AND ECOSYSTEM[edit]

My voiced concern is that these people are computing other organisms, killing them, and even murdering humans. They already chose to communicate with the illegal systematics of octoelectronics so they can force anyone to change in instinct, character, and look. Most people that do this type of thing are really manslaughter's in the form of a human identity. 107.242.121.5 (talk) 18:51, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]