Talk:Order of Clans of Ireland

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with Clans of Ireland on 8 December 2021. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was to merge.

Merge[edit]

CLOSED

merge as per WP:Consensus. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Administrative closure

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

To my mind, the subjects of the Order of Clans of Ireland and Clans of Ireland articles have limited independent notability and each article duplicates or overlaps (both in text and context) the other. Unless there are other thoughts, I'm proposing to merge the text of Order of Clans of Ireland to Clans of Ireland#Order of Clans of Ireland. And to redirect the related title to that section. Guliolopez (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The Order of Clans of Ireland topic is of questionable notability in its own right at all, sources beyond the Clans of Ireland website seeming lacking; it appears that media and academic coverage remains low. And the CIOM honorific is not one which is in any, even remote, general use, so using it after individuals' names is questionable. Even the basic organisation article is not well-sourced, but the article and subject have some substance, so I think the Order can fit well as a (slightly expanded) section of the organisation article. SeoR (talk) 19:22, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.