Talk:Order of battle at the Battle of Trenton
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Order of battle at the Battle of Trenton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Order of battle at the Battle of Trenton is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Order of battle at the Battle of Trenton is part of the New York and New Jersey campaign series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on August 3, 2020. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FL-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hessians
[edit]You should probably change all of the references to Hessians to Hesse-Kasselians or whatever the correct term is, there were multiple hessian states fighting in the revolution but only Hesse-Kassel had soldiers at trenten (as opposed to Hesse-Hanau).XavierGreen (talk) 22:07, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- I believe the correct term is "Hessian" if they're from Hesse-Kassel (or Hesse-Hanau). (Either that or the more cumbersome "Germans from Hesse-Kassel".) Magic♪piano 02:48, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps then in the Section title a label saying Hesse-Kassel and United Kingdom rather than Hessian and British army?XavierGreen (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- I think that's a fine suggestion for the label. Magic♪piano 19:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
- Perhaps then in the Section title a label saying Hesse-Kassel and United Kingdom rather than Hessian and British army?XavierGreen (talk) 15:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Review
[edit]As requested on my talk page, I'm leaving a short review of this page here. Firstly, I think this is an excellent order of battle, and I really like the way that the tables are presented. I also think the paragraphs that begin each table are well-written and informative. My problems with the page relate to statistics. The advantage of this type of list is the ability to cram in statistics that would be rounded on as boring in a prose article, but are of interest to people wanting to look deeper at the raw data. In particular, the tables have no totals, giving us complete numbers of guns, men etc in each army. Secondly, there is no information about casualties in the battle by unit and a brief comment on the unit's activities during the battle - where known, this information would be a great improvement. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Casualty counts is an obvious thing. I believe Stryker actually lists the few American casualties by name and unit; I'm not sure if he has a breakout of the Hessian casualties at the regimental level since I haven't looked for it yet; Fischer does not provide one. Accounts of the battle are reasonably detailed; unit-level activity blurbs are definitely a possibility. There are totals provided for each division and brigade (on their respective lines), and I provide a grand total for the Continentals at the bottom of their table. Thanks for your feedback. Magic♪piano 18:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- You are correct regarding the Continentals, although Hessian totals would be useful too.--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:06, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
American numbers
[edit]There's a vast discrepancy between the American numbers for Washington's force given here (>5,000) and those cited in the article (2,400; some other sources say 2,700). The latter seems to be a figure generally agreed upon by other easily available references. This lists Sullivan's division as 2,624 and Greene's as 2,690, while other sources record them as 1,200 and 1,500 respectively. This is a huge difference--does anyone know why this variance exists? It's not just a matter of counting officers and musicians. Are the larger numbers perhaps enrolled or authorized strength instead of fit for service? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.125.4.210 (talk) 22:33, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, that was me. I've looked up Stryker and found a different one of his books, "The Continental Army at the crossing of the Delaware River on Christmas", which lists the entire strength of the Continental Army before the attack as around 8,000, or 6,000 effectives. This is confirmed by his work cited, "The Battles of Trenton and Princeton" (and cites Lord Stirling as mentioning the figure of 6,000 men) and may be the key to the discrepancy. If the entire force (Cadwalader's, Dickinson's, and the main army with Washington could only muster 6,000 effectives, and Cadwalader and Ewing were unable to cross, then maybe there were only 2,400 who actually got into action; the 5,400 listed may well be just paper strength. Winterbadger (talk) 23:17, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
- FL-Class Featured topics articles
- Wikipedia featured topics New York and New Jersey campaign featured content
- Low-importance Featured topics articles
- Featured lists that have appeared on the main page
- Featured lists that have appeared on the main page once
- FL-Class military history articles
- FL-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- FL-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- FL-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- FL-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- FL-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- FL-Class American Revolutionary War articles
- American Revolutionary War task force articles
- FL-Class New Jersey articles
- Low-importance New Jersey articles
- WikiProject New Jersey articles
- FL-Class List articles
- Low-importance List articles
- WikiProject Lists articles