Talk:Ordsall Hall

Ordsall Hall has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 14, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed

United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester High‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Inconsistency

"There was probably a house at Ordsall by 1251 when William de Ferrers, Earl of Derby, exchanged the manor for land in Pendleton."

I've moved this from the History section to here because it seems to be inconsistent with the claim that Ordsall Hall is 820 years old. --Malleus Fatuarum 19:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How can a "Tudor mansion" be 820 years old anyway? --Malleus Fatuarum 21:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Much of this article appears to have been copied and pasted from the Salford City Council web site, [1], and so needs to be rewritten or deleted. --Malleus Fatuarum 21:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

There's a bit about both Ordsall and the hall at The History of the County of Lancaster. Looks very usable. --Jza84 | Talk 00:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's used once already. I had a look through (albeit only briefly, I'm trying to sift through the information that site provides for Warwick Castle and it gets a bit tedious when it's just dates of repairs) and it seems most elements are already covered. It would be nice to get hold of a plan of the hall, but that's minor. It's a really good article and I can't see it having trouble at WP:GAC. Nev1 (talk) 00:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ordsall Hall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

This article meets the Good Article criteria and has therefore been passed. Gary King (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

I've uploaded some new photos of the hall that may be useful (while I was adding them I decided to take a look on flickr and the only image we can use that it worth uploading is this one, but I haven't uploaded it yet because it's similar to others. I've have more images, although mainly of the exterior. There are some of the Great Hall and the Star Chamber. I wasn't able to get an image like this as whenever I tried to take a picture, the sun was far too low and there was too much glare. Nev1 (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old copyvio?

On 30 January 2007 Fatpratmatt (talk · contribs) made this edit to the article. The text appears to be duplicated almost entirely at Salford City Council's website. The wayback machine doesn't have a copy of the page so it's not impossible that they borrowed content from Wikipedia, but my feeling is that's not the case. Although the article has been substantially rewritten since then, a few examples do survive. I'll help where I can. Nev1 (talk) 11:14, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The copyvio has been confirmed. The webpage moved address, but the wayback machine had a version from 10 March 2007. And according to the archived page it "was last updated on 16 October 2006", before Fatpratmatt's edit in January 2007. Nev1 (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Input needed

In the earliest description of the house, from 1380, it is described as comprising a hall, five chambers, a kitchen, a chapel, two stables, three granges, two shippons, a garner, a dovecote, an orchard and a windmill, together with 80 acres (32.4 ha) of arable land and 6 acres (2.4 ha) of meadow.

I'm tempted to put the above description in quotes, however there are two slight problems: 1) the Salford.gov webpage doesn't use quotes, so it's probably not precisely what the original source would have said (in translation) as would be the implication 2) the conversions aren't given in the Salford.gov webpage. I'm not quite sure how to proceed here; I'd like to just tweak what's written to change it into a quote, but is the first issue to problematic? Nev1 (talk) 15:26, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd go for using a quote, but start with: "Drawing on the earliest description of the house, from 1380, the Salford City Council describes how it comprised...", making clear its not a contemporary quote. The conversions could be put in square brackets, again making it clear that they're not in the original, perhaps. Hchc2009 (talk) 19:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief, I'd completely forgotten about this. I've chosen to use the wording you suggested. Nev1 (talk) 19:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ordsall Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090630003538/http://www.salford.gov.uk/leisure/museums/ordsallhall/ordsallhall-history.htm to http://www.salford.gov.uk/leisure/museums/ordsallhall/ordsallhall-history.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Ordsall Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]