Talk:Oregon Files

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

List of Characters[edit]

It has come to my attention through research on the topic that the list of characters was identical to one on http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/The_Oregon_Files before I edited and added to it. Gloryify (talk) 10:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The website mentions the source of its information as Wikipedia. 069952497a (talk) 01:56, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Working on[edit]

Hi, I wanted to put a list of the villains from the series but I haven't finished yet an aslo wanted some feedback on some of the content. If you have anything to add or a comment to make please feel free but please leave while I finish it off. Thanks Gloryify (talk) 10:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Major Antagonists[edit]

China (Golden Buddha)
(Sacred Stone)
(Dark Watch)
Congolese Army of Revolution (Skeleton Coast)
The Responsivists (Plague Ship)
(Corsair)

Moving my work to my talk page because there is more I want to work on. Thanks Gloryify (talk) 02:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Working on that. However, I'm focusing more on individuals right now. 069952497a (talk) 01:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TV Show[edit]

Wasn't there going to be a TV show/move based off this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErichSturmovik (talk • contribs) 21:18, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Co-authors[edit]

Co-author is an important role ;-)

This article must identify the co-author for each book, maybe at once if there was a simple succession.

It ought to explain the change(s), if there is any reliable source that gives a reason. Perhaps a book review, acknowledgment, afterword, etc, for the first Jack Du Brul volume. --P64 (talk) 16:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There should be articles for each book in this series[edit]

Each book in this series should have an article of its own. At one point the individual books started to be mentioned only via redirect files. Other book series have articles for each book in the series and the books of this series should be treated no differently. Bill Pollard (talk) 05:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]