Talk:Orion-class battleship

Orion-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 17, 2017. (Reviewed version).

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European / World War I / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Armour[edit]

Belt armour is conventionally referred to as Vertical and Deck armour as Horizontal in Naval construction.The Dart (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A far better description of the armour can be found in the article on HMS Monarch (1911)

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Orion-class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 14:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments[edit]

No dab links Y, no dead links N, no copyvio Y.
I would suggest removing the (RN) from "built for the Royal Navy (RN)", and then change the rest of the RNs to Royal Navy.
- I don't think so.
"The Orions were deemed obsolete by the end of the war in 1918 and" Suggest changing to: "The Orions were deemed obsolete by the end of the war, in 1918, and"
- The year's not really a subordinate clause there.
"A third dreadnought was added to the programme about April 1909" suggest changing about to around.
- OK.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"On her way to the scrapyard, she ran aground, but was refloated and scrapped the following year." Is it known where she ran aground?
- Added to the main body.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The supplement and Navy List links are dead.
- They all check out fine for me using the check external links in the toolbox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When I try and open them from the article it gives me "ia700709.us.archive.org’s server DNS address could not be found." -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They changed the links on me, but everything's updated.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]