Talk:Orthogonal coordinates

Student help[edit]

Hi everyone I'm a student of mechanical engineering,(M.Sc) ,I'd like to know the Gradient Operator in Toroidal Coordinates. My mail is Keivan82@yahoo.com

Thanks, Keivan (81.12.30.4) 29 July 2006, 18:31

Hi, Keivan, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To answer your question, the general formula is given in this article; it's the first formula under the "Differential operators" section. To make the general formula specific for toroidal coordinates, you have to replace the q1, q2 and q3 with the toroidal coordinates, and the scale factors h1, h2, h3 with the formulae found on the page for toroidal coordinates. If this article wasn't clear, or if you have other suggestions, please let us know!

By the way, please become a member of Wikipedia and learn to contribute constructively; it's that link in the upper right-hand corner. See you around Willow 06:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

addition of content[edit]

Not sure if the new sections sections including tables will be reverted... They came from Curvilinear coordinates, and were added since this article didn't include much of them (e.x. differential area/volume, and a summary of the coordinate intervals, h-scale factors, transformations from cartesian in various coordinate systems... even though there is the template:Orthogonal coordinate systems). F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑_ic_i 21:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Superscripts[edit]

When it says, "q = (q¹, q², ..., q^d) in which the coordinate surfaces all meet at right angles (note: superscripts are indices, not exponents)", wouldn't it be simpler to just change the superscripts to subscripts?--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 11:41, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Superscripts ahere to the contravariant/covariant convention, where contravariant components of vectors are indexed with superscripts and covariant components with subscripts. Using this convention and superscripts on coordinates, you get 'conservation of index height', where a subscript in the denominator equals a superscript in the numerator and vice versa, and the height should match on both sides of the equation. Chris2crawford (talk) 13:07, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Basis vector formulae section error?[edit]

I think instead of:

${\begin{aligned}d\mathbf {S} &=(h_{i}q_{i}{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{i})\times (h_{j}q_{j}{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{j})\\&=h_{i}h_{j}q_{i}q_{j}\left({\frac {\partial \mathbf {r} }{\partial q_{i}}}\times {\frac {\partial \mathbf {r} }{\partial q_{j}}}\right)\\&=h_{i}h_{j}q_{i}q_{j}{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{k}\end{aligned}}$

it shoul be:

${\begin{aligned}d\mathbf {S} &=(h_{i}q_{i}{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{i})\times (h_{j}q_{j}{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{j})\\&=q_{i}q_{j}\left({\frac {\partial \mathbf {r} }{\partial q_{i}}}\times {\frac {\partial \mathbf {r} }{\partial q_{j}}}\right)\\&=q_{i}q_{j}{\hat {\mathbf {e} }}_{k}\end{aligned}}$ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadapez (talk • contribs) 21:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Orthogonal coordinates/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Suggest to give more details for some examples, e.g., say what the h's are, and add structure to the 3d examples list. Geometry guy 12:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 12:22, 23 May 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 02:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

explanation of notation not clear[edit]

In the section "Table of three-dimensional orthogonal coordinates" I am not sure what "the entries are grouped by their interval signatures, e.g. COCCCO for spherical coordinates" means, and there is no explanation or link.Chris2crawford (talk) 13:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary suggests that it refers to the closed/open nature of the ends of the coordinate ranges. It is not clear what significance this closed/openness has, and in any case it seems a little arbitrary since a different 'signature' could be obtained by, for example, taking the coordinates in a different order.

My preference would be to list the systems in alphabetical order (and without stating the ordering criterion). catslash (talk) 17:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

elipse, parabola coordinates[edit]

In the section "Table of two-dimensional orthogonal coordinates", the "elipse, parabola" coordinates can be generalized to: u=x^2+ky^2, y=vx^k, which are not parabolas for k!=2. This family only works for ellipses in u, not other powers of x,y, and of course any f(u) and g(v) has the same contours, so that is the most general form I could find. For k=1, you get polar coordinates with f(u)=sqrt(u) and g(v)=atan(v). Chris2crawford (talk) 13:18, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

point dipol[edit]

I think it should be 'dipole' in English. Chris2crawford (talk) 03:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]