Talk:Ostrova (disambiguation)

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 13 July 2023 by reviewer Umakant Bhalerao (talk · contribs).

Requested move 17 July 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Mdewman6 (talk) 23:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ostrova (disambiguation) → Ostrova – no primary topic. A cursory web search does not show that the Russian village is the predominant topic; there's another tiny village with an article in Estonia. "Ostrova" means island chain or islands, for more commonly encountered uses; and is also the feminine of Ostrov (Ostroff) surname. -- 67.70.25.80 (talk) 04:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. There are three entries and two WP:DABMENTIONS listed upon the Ostrova (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the redirect to the three-sentence stub delineating the village is primary over the combined notability of the remaining four entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 05:48, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The Russian village with 19 inhabitants is clearly no primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:47, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.