Jump to content

Talk:Ouellette v. Viacom International Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lilylolo's Feedback on Article:

[edit]

I thought you did a great job on your article, and hit on every requirement on the 15-point checklist. I did not see any major changes that need to be made. Some minor suggestions include:

  • (1) I'm not sure whether phrases like " service providers can rest easier" and "oddly parallel" are neutral statements or opinions (see checklist #6). Perhaps you could put it in a separate, "Significance" section at the end of the Article.
  • (2) The sentence "Judges give a plaintiff in a proceeding without a lawyer the benefit of the doubt", should be in past tense, in accordance with the rest of the verb tense of your article.
  • (3) For better flow/ transition, perhaps have a short sentence after "Judges give a plaintiff in a proceeding without a lawyer the benefit of the doubt,[10] but the plaintiff must still have a valid underlying cause of action." saying that the plaintiff in this case could not show a cause of action under the DMCA or the ADA.
  • (4) In the "External Links" section, is the Magistrate's findings also available on Lexis?


Lilylolo (talk) 21:02, 5 March 2012 (UTC)Lilylolo, 5/3/2012[reply]

File:MontanaDistrictCourt.gif Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:MontanaDistrictCourt.gif, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:MontanaDistrictCourt.gif)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

[edit]

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2012 Q1 term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 16:50, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ouellette_v._Viacom_International_Inc.&oldid=1212470366"