Talk:Our Lady of Peñafrancia

Christianity: Saints / Catholicism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Saints (assessed as Low-importance).
	Catholic Church portal This article is supported by WikiProject Catholicism (assessed as Low-importance).

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms that are used in it (including jeepney and cyberlibel) may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

File:Penafrancia-naga.gif Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Penafrancia-naga.gif, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and tone concerns

Hello. I am concerned about the sourcing of this article. Three "References" were provided with zero footnotes. It turns out that two of the references were Blogspot blogs, and do not meet our criteria for reliability. Furthermore, one of them had verbatim paragraphs copied from this article (the blog was published in September 2016, and the edits to this article predated that publication.) So I have removed those links from the article. But even with a comprehensive PDF from a local high school, we still have the problem of zero footnotes. Now much of the narrative in this article is fanciful and uses an unencyclopedic tone. It is apparently written by devotees. So this is not suitable for Wikipedia's standards. The article needs to be reduced to verifiable facts and the tone needs to be impartial and non-judgemental. I haven't touched the article prose yet, because frankly I'm tempted to begin deleting large swaths of it... hopefully it can be salvaged less destructively. But we'll need sources. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Peñafrancia 2021 Logo.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]