Talk:Outline of the Vietnam War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Anti War Publications[edit]

You've got a serious problem here. A lot of the listed publications came into existence a long time before Viet Nam. I also note you do not have a list of anti war publications for North Viet Nam. It would be nice to be a little more even handed (i.e. NPOV).24.10.102.46 17:38, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the link to Avor manhattan's book about vietnam.Bharatveer 15:10, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmmm. Are you sure you want a link to THAT book by THAT author? I wouldn't.24.10.102.46 04:49, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any reasons? Bharatveer 05:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the man wrote anti-catholic conspiracy books that are currently being offered by Chick Publications (A dubious reference right there. Also, check out the misspellings on a supposedly intelligent website). Research on the man finds almost nothing except glorifying excessives: "The greatest writer in the world", "spent most of the rest of his life in banishment"(even AFTER the war and the death of Mussolini? Sounds more like exaggeration of a normal life choice).

At least one of his books about the wealth of the Vatican can be demonstrated to be (most likely) wrong by simple accounting. Yes, they took in a lot of money. NOT MENTIONED, they spent it almost as fast as it came in.

It's your call. I SUGGEST you don't use Manhattan, Chick, or any conspiracy theory as a reference.24.10.102.46 03:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Broken links[edit]

I was clicking some of the authors at the bottom of the page and found some broken links.69.6.162.160 15:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Brian Pearson[reply]

Operations?[edit]

What is the basic guideline for listing operations? The current list is woefully incomplete, unless you have some sort of size/scale parameter.Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines[edit]

"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 00:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Outline of the Vietnam War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:46, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

proxy war[edit]

To editor A bicyclette: The cited source says "...the Vietnam War was a proxy war between the United States, the Soviet Union — then growing rapidly in military power, confidence, and prestige — and communist China." and "...this particular Cold War proxy conflict...". Nobody cares about what's true. Stop edit warring. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:36, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks[edit]

This page contains numerous redlinks of battles that: (i) I can't identify; (ii) are covered elsewhere ; or (iii) lack RS and so will never have pages created about them. Many of these were added by an IP in December 2008 here: [1]. Accordingly I believe that all redlinks should be updated or deleted. Mztourist (talk) 04:48, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone ahead and made the necessary changes, 2 redlinks remain: Operation Baker which may have sufficient RS for a page and Operation Chicago Peak which does justify a page but I am unable to access the relevant RS. Mztourist (talk) 05:22, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]