Talk:Overloaded: The Singles Collection/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 13:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article tomorrow. (Monday 30th) Aaron You Da One 11:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Calvin. Till 23:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


Info box[edit]

  • You still list the normal chronology of the last and next album, regardless of what type of album it is.

Lead[edit]

  • No issues.

Background[edit]

  • No issues.

Release and content[edit]

  • No issues.

Critical reception[edit]

  • No issues.

Commercial performance[edit]

  • No issues.

Singles[edit]

  • No issues.

Promotion[edit]

  • No issues.

Tracklisting[edit]

  • No issues.

Charts and certifications[edit]

  • I c/e this section slightly.
  • Can you add a release history table?
    • Okay. Should I also list the credits? Till 11:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Summary[edit]

On hold for 7 days. Aaron You Da One 11:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]