Talk:P600

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the P600 page.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
	This disambiguation page is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Syntactic and therefore semantic?[edit]

I'm not a neurolinguist, but the word “semantic” does not make any sense to me in the first sentence of the section on elicitation: The P600 was originally considered a "syntactic" ERP, and therefore is elicited by several types of semantic phenomena, including ungrammatical stimuli, garden path sentences [...] How about substituting “syntactic”? --Thüringer ☼ (talk) 09:00, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, looks like that must have been a typo. rʨanaɢ (talk) 10:26, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]