Talk:PG 1047+003

UY Sex or Y Sex?[edit]

The infobox is contradictory, it lists this as UY Sex and Y Sextantis

76.66.197.2 (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 24 February 2024[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus for move after 1 month. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PG 1047+003 → UY Sextantis – According to WP:STARNAMES, for stars that have no Bayer or Flamsteed designations, the Henry Draper Catalogue (HD) number, variable-star designation or the Gliese number should be used for the article name about the star. As PG 1047+003 has no HD number or Gliese number, the variable-star designation UY Sextantis should be used. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 16:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support While the variable star designation is less common overall based on an ADS search, it's simpler and seems to be preferred by newer sources. SevenSpheres (talk) 17:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.