Talk:PP3
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Big threshold
[edit]It's a pity it is not citeable, but the trouble with the program is that it is exceedingly hard to install, especially on Windows (I presume). It generates the wrong thing: PostScript and SVG would be better than generating TeX, which generates EPS, which generates DVI, which generates PDF. There are a lot of advantages, such as ease of use, a Milky Way etc, that will be hard to replace. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 07:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Categorisation
[edit]From the info box: "Type planetarium". However, there is an inline comment in the source: "PP3 is NOT planetarium software, it makes maps. Please do not add that category." Should the info box content be changed? If yes, what should it be?
Categories:
- Stub-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- Stub-Class software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Stub-Class software articles of Unknown-importance
- All Software articles
- Automatically assessed Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles
- Bottom-importance Astronomy articles
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Bottom-importance