The contents of the ProfNet page were merged into PR Newswire on 4 September 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Not notable on its own merits Rogermx (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I note the intervening deletion discussion. I support the merge, on the grounds that discussing them together seems more efficient for readers. Might XOR'easter have a view, having improved ProfNet since the article was proposed for merging? Klbrain (talk) 15:15, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I tentatively oppose the merge, since ProfNet turned out to have a substantial history prior to the acquisition, and there's no need to discuss it only as part of its current ownership. XOR'easter (talk) 16:21, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge - per nomination, even if XOR'easter is stating that ProfNet has its own history the article has not reflected but of it to be an independent article as such it can be reflected at the PR Newswire. Then in the if the PR Newswire article becomes long that is when you can propose a split. - DownTownRich (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
