Talk:PZL P.11
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
[edit]User:Jinxs added the aero-table, hope that's ok w/ u.
- Sure. Any idea when is the temporary aero table replaced with a proper infobox? //Halibutt 13:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Best airplane in the world briefly, eh? Sources?
You Tube
[edit]Short clip at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTHFeNBqyJ4
81.86.144.210 21:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Difficult to say, and the engine cover didn't look right. Still maybe in slow montion and zoom 100% can be obtained. --Jinxs 22:35, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
PZL 11 c
[edit]I've heared that every third PZL 11c was fitted with two 20mm cannons which were synchronised at several hundred meters as they were meant to be used in a stand-off attack on enemy bombers (to out-range the manually operated defensive machineguns of the bombers). Is this true?
Veljko Stevanovich 5. 8. 2007. 8:45 UTC+1
- No, it's certainly not true. Piotr Mikołajski 19:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- From Il-2 game I heard that it has machineguns with intentionaly low accuracy/unmatched barrel axises to provide a "shotgun" effect.--Oleg Str (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- Highly implausible. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 11:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC).
- From Il-2 game I heard that it has machineguns with intentionaly low accuracy/unmatched barrel axises to provide a "shotgun" effect.--Oleg Str (talk) 08:47, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Comparsions
[edit]- Trying to make the comparison to the Junkers Ju-87, an attack aircraft to the PZL. P.11 is illogical. You are comparing two dissimilar types. If you want to make valid comparison, be ready to provide authoritative and valid reference sources. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:39, 7 July 2011 (UTC).
B-class review
[edit]This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 03:42, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class Polish military history articles
- Polish military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Start-Class aviation articles
- Start-Class aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aircraft articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Poland articles
- Low-importance Poland articles
- WikiProject Poland articles