Jump to content

Talk:Package-deal fallacy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Package Deals In Contracts

[edit]

I removed this passage:

Use of this fallacy is also common in contract negotiation, where it is called iunctim or tying.

Because package deals in contract negotiations are not a logical fallacy in the strictest sense, are not always against the law nor generally frowned upon by the business community. Dhvrm 23:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

this article is trying to explain the fallacy of division —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.15.29.209 (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article mistakes inference for a fallacy

[edit]

If it's true that a candidate is a conservative, then one can reasonably infer that he will oppose gun control and abortion. A fallacy would be "My opponent voted against against higher taxes and welfare, so it follows that he will oppose gun control and abortion".

Really, almost any example would be better than this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.248.226.133 (talk) 04:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]