Jump to content

Talk:Paddy Finucane/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 01:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    See below
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Looks pretty good to me


Some minor stuff:

  1. "down wind" -> "downwind"
  2. "Spring" -> spring
  3. "Gazetted" -> "gazetted" (multiple times)
  4. "baled" -> "bailed" (multiple times)
  5. "caliber" -> "calibre"
  6. "sot" -> "shot"
  7. "602 squadron" -> "602 Squadron"
  8. "shoto" -> "Sholto" (multiple times)
  9. "610, 616 and 41 squadrons" -> "610, 616 and 41 Squadrons"

Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:00, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkeye7, It looks like your concerns have been addressed, not sure why the nominator hasn't responded to you to notify you of such, but, whatever. Mr rnddude (talk) 10:55, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Passing article now. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]