Jump to content

Talk:Palazzo Sacchetti

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk11:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The facade of Palazzo Sacchetti along Via Giulia
The facade of Palazzo Sacchetti along Via Giulia
  • ... that in 1557 Cardinal Giovanni Ricci sold fictitiously Palazzo Sacchetti (pictured) in Rome for 25,000 scudi to his friend Tommaso Marino? Source: "Difficoltà economiche lo costrinsero nel 1557 a una vendita fittizia del palazzo per 25.000 scudi all’amico Marino" ([1])
    • ALT1:... that the Sacchetti family has fully owned Palazzo Sacchetti (pictured) in Rome for 366 years? Source: "Gli Acquaviva nel 1649 lo vendettero ai Sacchetti" (Pietrangeli (1981), p. 42, and [2] for the partial sale in 2015)

Created by Alessandro57 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:44, 26 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • This article is new enough and long enough and the image is suitably licensed. The hook facts are cited inline and either hook could be used, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done.
  • @Alessandro57: I have added a translation tag to the talk page of the article to comply with Wikipedia's copyright criteria, as this provides attribution to the creators of the Italian Wikipedia article. I'm not sure that it is really necessary here because you wrote the bulk of the Italian language article, but there were other editors involved with it in the more distant past, so it is better to be safe. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:54, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Cwmhiraeth: thanks for reviewing! It wasn't really necessary, since I overwrote the whole article (so basically I am the only contributor), except the last paragraph (trivia type) which I decided not to reproduce here, but if you think that it is better so for me there is no problem. Thanks again! Alex2006 (talk) 18:25, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]