Talk:Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Palo Alto Battlefield National Historical Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060911174519/http://tps.cr.nps.gov:80/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=620&ResourceType=Site to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=620&ResourceType=Site

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:56, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Status/Infobox[edit]

This article had some infobox errors related to it's designation which I have tried to clean up. I still haver some questions. This battlefield was listed as a NRHP site in 1960, and in the subset of "outstanding historical significance" National Historic Landmarks. Then in 1978, it became a National Historic Site and in 1990 a National Historic Park.

What are the current designations. I don't believe it is a NHS anymore since it was made a NHP. But is it still simultaneously a NHL, or was that superseded by NHS/NHP?

Depending on the answer to this, the infobox will need more updates. MB 01:41, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NHL and NRHP listing status are not superseded by any other actions; there are any number of NHSes and NHPs (or portions thereof) that are one or both of those. Magic♪piano 03:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Magicpiano, OK so it should be NRHP, NHL, & NHP. But rather than removing the NHS designations, wouldn't it be better to keep it but add "delisted_nrhp_type3 = date of redesignation to NHP"? I tried that as a test, and it added the NHS delisting date in the infobox, but did not seem to turn the NHS header grey and add "former". Perhaps it only does that with NRHP. But since it supports delisting dates for additional titles, shouldn't it provide full support? MB 16:51, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have to use "formernhs" as type. See my recent edit. Magic♪piano 17:45, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Magicpiano OK, there are sure a lot of combinations of parameters. I added the NHS delisting date to make it clear in the infobox the sequence, but it does show the same date twice. Feel free to revert if you think this is overkill. MB 18:47, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Another issue is that last month, another editor changed the infobox from Protected Area to NRHP. Since the NRHP infobox can be embedded with PA, I propose to do that. I have looked at some other of the NHP articles and see some use NRHP, some use Protected Area, and some embed. Since all NHP are automatically considered NRHP, shouldn't they all be Protected area/embedded NRHP? MB 18:56, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]