Talk:Palouse River

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Palouse River article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Idaho / Washington / Eastern Washington Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Idaho portal This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force.

Rivers Mid‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wakeboarding comment[edit]

I'm sorry, but I'm removing the wakeboading comment for lacking a neutral POV, and it isn't appropriate for Wikipedia outside of an article specifically about wakeboarding. Evening Scribe (talk) 06:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit?[edit]

I'm not sure what the "copyedit needed" tag is for. The text reads alright to me. Short and dry, sure, but acceptable. The tag was added a year ago so maybe old problems have been fixed? I'll take the tag out. If there are specific issues please point them out. I'll also remove the stub tags--it's a short article but not a mere stub. Pfly (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]