Talk:Park Avenue Historic District (Detroit)

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan: Detroit Mid‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Removal of buildings[edit]

I have removed two buildings (Park Avenue Building and Kales Building) from this list (and adjusted the individual pages) because these are not contributing properties to the Park Avenue district. Specifically the nomination states: "Two buildings flanking Park at its West Adams end, the Park Avenue Building and the Kales Building (fka Kresge Building), are within the directly adjacent Grand Circus Park Historic District, and thus not included in this district". I have added their images to the Grand Circus district page. kennethaw88 • talk 06:55, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Worth explaining, though, since the buildings are physically along Park Avenue. I added a paragraph based on your statement. Andrew Jameson (talk) 15:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]