Talk:Parker Morris Committee

Politics of the United Kingdom Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Social Housing in the United Kingdom B‑class (inactive)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Social Housing in the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Social Housing in the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Social Housing in the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Social Housing in the United KingdomSocial Housing in the United Kingdom articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Engineering Unassessed

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Would it be an etiquette violation to use this space to ask about more sources of information about the Parker Morris Committee and report? I would love to know more.

--JoyKnoblauch 03:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. 80.0.102.40 (talk) 12:14, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Parker Morris standards and their sorry abandonment[edit]

Before reading this article I thought that the abandonment of Park Morris Standards sometime in the 1980s by the Thatcher government was responsible for the mushrooming of hundreds of thousands of horrible little houses with tiny rooms (usually no hallway from the front door either - a retrograde step going back to the worst quality 2 up 1 down terracced housing of the turn of the 19th/20th centuries - no dining room either - eg bedrooms 6ft by 7 ft) sold by profit-maximinsing large-scale builders. Hence loss of the standards was a very bad thing.

I thought that it was the 1980s removal of the requirement for private builders to follow Parker Morris Standards that lead directly to the bad quality house described above, but the article seems to suggest that private bulders did not have to follow PM standards anyway. Clarification please?

As these standards affect the lives of many hundreds of thousands of people, I think the article ought to go into more detail please - for example what about room sizes?

I also did not realise that PMS only started in the 1960s, yet 1950s council houses seem to be generously sized. What were the space standards responsible for their building? It seems unlikely that penny pinching local authorities would volunatarily build them to that spec.

Three cheers to English Partnerships for reintroducing PMS+! I hope this becomes extended to private housebuilding also, making a real tangible difference to peoples lives. 80.0.102.40 (talk) 11:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New mention on BBC News, see this link: [1] Not sure where it fits in the article, so I leave it up to you. RedTomato (talk) 14:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In "Chelmsley Wood Sketch Proposals Areas 3 13" dated December 1967, it says "As from 1st January, 1969, all dwellings must be in accordance with modified Parker Morris Standards".

But that may be misleading as this document is for the development by Birmingham City, so the "all dwellings" may not be ALL dwellings ? 79.78.60.213 (talk) 10:54, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]