Talk:Parlay

Gambling Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gambling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gambling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GamblingWikipedia:WikiProject GamblingTemplate:WikiProject GamblingGambling articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

WikiProject Gambling To-do:

Current collaborations:

Improve an article to FA

Improve an article to A

Help with the Gambling articles needing attention.
Tag the talk pages of Gambling-related articles with the {{WikiProject Gambling}} banner.
The link to the Missouri gambling site is now out of date and needs to be updated.
Japan section reads as though it was written by the gambling industry - quotes of 160% returns are 'citation needed'.

On 26 October 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Parlay (gambling) to Parlay. The result of the discussion was moved.

Opening comment

– This page seems to be directly copied and pasted from the About.com definition linked in the "External Links". The original version of this page credited the About.com definition as a "Bibliography". Should this be reverted?

The math was wrong, so I changed it. A coin flip bet would pay 1:1. A two team coin flip bet has a 25% chance of winning, so it pays out 3:1 true odds. To understand this, consider that on average every four times you bet, you will win once and lose 3 times, so to break even you will need to be paid 3:1 to counter your three losses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.175.47.240 (talk) 14:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why "Alex" instead of "Dorothy"?

"Lions, [Tigers], and Bears", funny. -Evanturner (talk) 08:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Less stake"

This article talks about English football clubs yet talks in dollars. Also, the yankee discussion says that the total winnings includes a deduction of the stake - is this true? AsparagusTips (talk) 11:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC) AsparagusTips[reply]

Yes - it's true when using decimal odds. When converting decimal odds to fractional you minus one e.g 5.0 decimal equals 4/1

SRL 212.159.45.102 (talk) 18:47, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Premier League example ought to use the British style for representing odds. Not sure how to convert them though. M0ffx (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Profitability of parlays in sports betting section not making sense

If the odds at the sports book is paying you more than the true odds if it was 55% in your favor, how is the following paragraph saying "even a 55% chance of winning each individual bet parlays are still not profitable in the long term?" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.214.189.2 (talk) 21:11, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. And what about that editorial comment about a 55% winning percentage being "an arguably impossible task"? Certainly, that needs a citation if it's true. But 55% is merely winning a bit less than five of nine wagers, which might be "impossible" in the long run when selecting teams randomly but is achievable with informed analysis. Many professional totes achieve that winning percentage. --Schnaz (talk) 15:57, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It clearly written by bookies that are trying to encourage parlays. "Yeah, if it's 50/50 parlays are not profitable, but if you know you are better than 50/50, say 55%, then a parlay is profitable!" No kidding! If you are at 55%, everything is profitable! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.86.18.167 (talk) 14:31, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How to read the card

What is the plus and minus mean on a card, when it has plus 14 beside the team? 2603:6081:D42:CFD9:9038:C7E2:88A6:68D6 (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 October 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parlay (gambling) → Parlay
Parlay → Parlay (disambiguation)

– Primary topic. Srnec (talk) 13:51, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support so long as the direct link to parley remains (alongside a link to parlay (disambiguation)) in the hatnote. Red Slash 17:07, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Problem https://www.google.co.uk/search?tbo=p&tbm=bks&q=%22parley+between+the+%22&num=10 In ictu oculi (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Parley =/= Parlay.--Ortizesp (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.