Talk:Parni Valjak

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Old talk[edit]

Jedan od najboljih bendova svih vremena ^^ Obozavam ih! SSJ 5 22:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The title of this article is wrong![edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no move. JPG-GR (talk) 05:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The proper capitalization is "Parni valjak". Please, change that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.198.144.10 (talk) 08:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. Can't be moved automatically, though - has to be requested via {{move}}. GregorB (talk) 14:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. GregorB (talk) 14:24, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the move to Parni valjak, at least until and unless some evidence is presented. It seems to be a proper name, see Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Lowercase second and subsequent words in titles, and the title of the home page http://www.parni-valjak.com/ of the official website, for example, capitalises both words. Andrewa (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Still: English capitalization of proper names (such as names of musical groups), or titles (such as song titles) does not apply to Croatian language. In Croatian, unless "valjak" itself is a proper name - and it isn't - it should be lower case. The official website is not entirely consistent, one can find both capitalizations - of which only the lower case, "Parni valjak" is orthographically correct in Croatian, while the upper case variation could be seen as trademark, so the equivalent of Wikipedia:Naming_conventions#Use_standard_English_for_titles_even_if_trademarks_encourage_otherwise could be applied here. GregorB (talk) 23:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"English capitalization of proper names (such as names of musical groups), or titles (such as song titles) does not apply to Croatian language" would be relevant if this were Croatian Wikipedia but it's English Wikipedia so oppose per WP:CAPS. Parni Valjak is a proper noun and should therefore carry title caps. — AjaxSmack 01:55, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, you can't apply orthography of English to other languages, English Wikipedia or not. For example, in article titles that are in German language, nouns are capitalized per German spelling rules, and adjectives are not, e.g. Conversations-Lexikon mit vorzüglicher Rücksicht auf die gegenwärtigen Zeiten. GregorB (talk) 08:38, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I get it: book and song titles are not proper names in this context. So, if we had a book, its title could be written as Parni valjak and it would be correct per WP:CAPS. This is somewhat odd. GregorB (talk) 08:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't they proper nouns? Why not? Beware the term proper name, it can be ambiguous. Andrewa (talk) 01:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We can and often do apply English orthography here. If you think this is wrong (and many do) then perhaps take it up as a policy issue, but this has been discussed at length in the past and the eventual conclusion has been to use English.

And it's a bit strange that the official website capitalises both words. How do you explain that? Andrewa (talk) 01:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very simple - and that's the wonderful irony here: aping English. GregorB (talk) 07:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that's possible, but the simpler explanation is that the writers of the page in question are speaking English, as should we. Andrewa (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, one cannot ape what one is not familiar with. :) Anyway: I have some qualms about this particular guideline (and some other WP:UE guidelines, incidentally), since I find it a bit surprising. Book titles behave differently. (But then again, book titles are translatable.)

Here's an illustration: in Croatian song titles, only the first word is capitalized. Same with musical group names. But: when writing about a foreign group, or a song titled in a foreign language, the original capitalization is retained. I really, really wish English could behave the same; especially here, in an encyclopedia. But you're right in that this is a policy issue, and it should be handled that way. GregorB (talk) 08:22, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The overriding principle here is that Wikipedia does not advocate anything. We describe.

Various languages do things in various ways: I find that the French for example try to pronounce my surname phonetically, and according to French phonology, and have great trouble with it, and they do the same with recent borrowings; The English on the other hand attempt to pronounce non-English surnames and recent borrowings according to the phonetics and phonology of the original language, and only anglicise them gradually. With respect to capitalisation, the policy writers seem to have believed (and I would agree) that we tend to impose English conventions immediately, a bit like the French do with their pronunciation. Or as Henry Higgins sagely observered, The French don't care if they do, actually, as long as they pronounce it properly. Andrewa (talk) 22:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Parni Valjak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100919145723/http://parnivaljak.host-ed.net/ to http://parnivaljak.host-ed.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:18, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]