Talk:Parsnip/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 03:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A tasty article, full of flavour

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   Some of the external links could use access dates. Also, the last one is broken.

   Done. They all work for me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

   B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:

   One "citation required"

   New source found. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All images are appropriately licensed.

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• Thank you for the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2015 (UTC)