Talk:Part III (Obi-Wan Kenobi)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Part III (Obi-Wan Kenobi) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Star Wars Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Star Wars, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Star Wars saga on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Star WarsWikipedia:WikiProject Star WarsTemplate:WikiProject Star WarsStar Wars articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Star Wars To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Tag the talk pages of Star Wars-related articles with the {{WikiProject Star Wars}} banner. Update the classification of articles in Category:Unassessed Star Wars articles and Category:Unknown-importance Star Wars articles.
Citing sources : Jedi, Sith
Cleanup : Remove any In-universe information at Category:Star Wars articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction.
Copyedit : Under Early Life. Fix grammar of "towns (plural) predominantly Protestant technical college" to "town's (possessive)..."
Stubs : Category:Star Wars stubs
Other : * See the things to do page
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

How many reviews do you count?

Something weird is happening with Rotten Tomatoes. The page clearly lists 20 reviews for episode 3. I made sure to refresh the page so I wasn't getting an old page and I've saved an archive copy too and still 20 reviews are listed.[1] Yet somehow another editor got 21 reviews listed at Rotten Tomatoes. (Strangely, lower down on the page it does say "View All Critic Reviews (21)" but I click on the link and count all the reviews shown and still only 20 reviews.) Is Rotten Tomatoes trying to show different versions of the page to different regions? Whatever it is, something is messed up. -- 109.77.197.59 (talk) 01:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps "Critics Ratings: 20" hasn't updated. — SirDot (talk) 01:30, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RT updates weirdly sometimes. You should see the correct amount soon. -- Zoo (talk) 01:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weird but I waited and refreshed again and the review count now matches the 21 reviews the other editor added to this page. It is weird that no one added the Rotten Tomatoes score already before now and then that it would change so suddenly right after I finally do add it. -- 109.77.197.59 (talk) 02:06, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace

@Adamstom.97 I have prepped the article for mainspace. Dcdiehardfan (talk) 18:36, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done - adamstom97 (talk) 21:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction in Lead

The lead of this article includes a notable contradiction in the line "Critics highlighted the duel between Darth Vader and Obi-Wan Kenobi, and praised Vader and Kenobi's characterization, and Chow's direction, though some critics felt the duel was underwhelming". There's no definitive answer on people's thoughts about the duel. Could it be a little more consistent? 137.111.165.22 (talk) 22:52, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]