Talk:Parthenia (music)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dating

If it was dedicated to the couple who were betrothed in 12/1612, the article should explain how a publication date of "around 1611" is justified by the sources. Davidships (talk) 08:40, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quite so. Changed it... Nick Michael (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Italics

According to Wikipedia:Manual of_Style/Titles#Neither, "Names (not to be confused with titles) of some works of art," should use neither italics or quotation marks. Of the items listed at {{Renaissance music manuscript sources}} only one of the article titles is italicized within the article (Elizabeth Rogers' Virginal Book) and some are italicized within the article and use {{Italic title}} (Fitzwilliam Virginal Book, My Ladye Nevells Booke, Parthenia (music), Parthenia Inviolata). Is the title of this article a title of a work of art, or is it a name of a work of art (and should not be italicized within the article nor use {{Italic title}})? Hyacinth (talk) 21:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An interesting question. The reference is to a work of visual art, given a conventional name which is not a title. I think all of the musical examples you name are actual titles. Parthenia and Parthenia inviolata are certainly both published titles, but perhaps closer examination of the other cases is indicated. Thanks for bringing this up.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 03:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]