Talk:Pascal matrix

:)

Done elements of S_ij and general expression for trace. I'll do expressions for U and L in the next day or so. Dan Pope 00:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea, by the way.

Also, just wanted to say that using the to-do list was a great idea on talk pages! Absolutely. I hope we can carry on working on these articles, Haseldon. I've really been enjoying it. Thanks also for the nice expansions of Shift matrix.

Dan Pope 00:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I think these are great, too. In particular, I like how these make it possible to break up the editing process. Haseldon 08:58, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

a lot more properties

I have a lot of more properties which I find much interesting - far too many to put them all in this article. But maybe some are worth been mentioned?

I feel not experienced enough with wikipedia to decide which and what... You may be interested in my three collections concerning the pascal-matrix

(the first deal with it, leads to the relation between pascal-matrix and bernoulli-numbers) pascal_bernoulli

(more advanced, but still clumsy) pmatrix

(to get the directory finding intro & notation: index

About the notation: notation

and the new collection (nothing new against pmatrix, but more straight and encyclopedic) binomialmatrix

If elements of this would be of interest, contact me by email, since I do not read this each day. Also if it would be appropriate one may link to these pages in the article (the last one under construction and will be filled up from time to time).

--Gotti 16:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Rank of symmetric Pascal matrix

Is the rank of symmetric Pascal matrix always equal to number of matrix lines (m)?--Kozuch (talk) 13:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]