Jump to content

Talk:Pat Condell/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I have decided to review this article. Brambleclawx 22:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ok, so I've decided that when reviewing this article, I will fix any minor spelling and grammar issues I come across, but I cannot fix much else without researching, the topic, so it will be up to you to take care of anything that needs fixing. Brambleclawx 23:05, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.


After some looking, I have my doubts. You have not changed the page significantly, if at all, since it was last failed.

The last nomination resulted in a fail because, as the reviewer pointed out, there are several unreliable sources, Youtube being one. Although I understand that sometimes you have no choice but to cite YouTube for statistics such as view counts, I feel you are in need of some more reliable sources. You have way too many YouTube references.


Pass or Fail:

On the grounds that you have not imporved the article significantly since your last failure, I have decided to quick-fail this nomination.


Suggestion(s)[edit]

  • Improve the references


Reviewer: Brambleclawx 22:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]