Talk:Patek Philippe/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Neutrality
The lead is nigh but promotional garbage. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
I think I fixed it -- Domino111Talk 02:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.32.249 (talk)
I believe the following sentence (IN THE ANNIVERSARY PARAGRAPH) to be in error: "...including the date of Easter, Hanukkah, Ramadan, body temperature, a thermometer, time of sunrise, equation of time, sidereal time,'. Most of the listed complications are correct except Date of Ramadan, Hanuka and Body Temperature. Horology (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- The lead and much of the rest of the article were written promotionally, as two editors noted above. I would ask whoever wrote this material originally to please observe the policies of WP:NPOV, WP:NOTADVERTISING, and, of course, the core WP:V, as well as the guidelines of WP:TONE and WP:DATED — all of which this article violated. --Tenebrae (talk) 13:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
- As I have just posted at the anon-IP talk page User talk:124.122.173.153, "Your blanket revert at Patek Philippe & Co. violates a number of Wikipedia policies, including core policies at the heart of this encyclopedia. Please read the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. "Common wisdom" is NOT allowed. Everything has to be verified by WP:RS cites. If you revert again to the policy-violating version after this warning, this may be considered vandalism by an admin, who will be contacted. It is important to read and understand Wikipedia policies and guidelines before editing." --Tenebrae (talk) 15:57, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
most primly Calvinist
I don't know what it means, either, but that is what the source says. Let's talk about it before deciding. TomS TDotO (talk) 22:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Patek Philippe & Co.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://www.forbes.com/2001/11/28/1128pow.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026094849/http://marina.fortunecity.com/westindia/59/ppc89.htm to http://marina.fortunecity.com/westindia/59/ppc89.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101229073137/http://www.lussoluxury.com/feature/69/david-and-goliath to http://www.lussoluxury.com/feature/69/david-and-goliath
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
watches
i can’t get the back of my watch on to save my life. fuck the guy who designed watches like this 194.207.77.66 (talk) 00:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)