Talk:Patella vulgata

General Opinion

I think this article should be a mid- or high importance article. This species is widespread and very familiar- I suggest that this species is the main one upon which all the hundreds of species that bear the informal name "Limpet" is based and comparisons will gererally be made to this one.

I suggest that this article needs a history including historical references to its use as food and reference to modern limpet eating- do people still eat it?

More info on how widespread it is and any info on how it spreads, its prefered habitat and its food would be good.

Thanks,

IceDragon64 (talk) 21:46, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Edibleness is not really a neutrality issue. Citation needed, perhaps. In any case the article for Madeira has a nice photo of a plate of these prepared as food, and a Google image search for Lapas produces plenty more. Is edibility really in question? 82.35.199.68 (talk) 18:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Patella vulgata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-31500883
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071013131022/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/nature/blueplanet/factfiles/molluscs/limpet_bg.shtml to http://www.bbc.co.uk/nature/blueplanet/factfiles/molluscs/limpet_bg.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Removed a contentious claim

Today I removed this phrase in the lede: " and is also found on the South Coast of NSW, Australia."

I think it is not appropriate to quote such an unlikely claim from a small "seashells of the world book" which is almost certainly erroneous in listing this as a fact.

Invertzoo (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

References