Talk:Patent and Designs Act 1911

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

The Patents and Designs Act 1911[edit]

Have added country category to article, but is this article correct? Bangladesh would have been part of British India in 1911. Hugo999 (talk) 22:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh patent law[edit]

Shouldn't this page be renamed "Bangladesh patent law" Saltwolf (talk) 04:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious hoax[edit]

Bangladesh did not exist until 1971, so it is obviously impossible for its National Assembly to have passed an Act in 1911. DuncanHill (talk) 18:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To me, the Act was carried over from British India to both India and Pakistan, and from Pakistan to Bangladesh. The year it was created was 1911, so this was carried over with the Act to keep the identification. The Assembly would have ratified a whole load of pre-existing laws en bloc at the start of BD in order not to have anarchy until the Assembly could pass new ones. Once established, they could make any necessary changes. There are mentions of this Act on Google, so I didn't think it counted as a blatant hoax, and declined speedy. Peridon (talk) 10:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]