Talk:Patrick Cleburne

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePatrick Cleburne has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 27, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
May 30, 2009Good article nomineeListed
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 24, 2008.
Current status: Good article

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Patrick Cleburne/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Very good article: well-written, -cited and -illustrated; just placing on hold while the items below are addressed...

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  • Intro is really too short for GA, would normally expect a couple of paragraphs, each somewhat longer than the one that’s there now.
  • During the campaigns of 1863 in Tennessee, Cleburne and his soldiers fought at the Battle of Chickamauga, including a rare night assault and a fierce rear guard action that probably saved the Army of Tennessee from utter destruction by holding off a much larger Union force on the northern end of Missionary Ridge after the Battle of Missionary Ridge in Chattanooga, and at the Battle of Ringgold Gap in northern Georgia, in which Cleburne's men again protected the Army of the Tennessee as it retreated to Tunnel Hill, Georgia. This sentence really should be split, too big a mouthful...
  • Believe the "several geographic features" named after him should just be in a sentence, not a bulleted list.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  • Generally I find we only include items in a Reference section if they're specifically cited, otherwise they go under a Further Reading section. By that standard Buck, for instance, would be moved from References to Further Reading.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • Think we should drop "solid" from solid, middle-class - seems a bit opinionated.
  • ...events that some say indeed came to pass sounds like editorialising, even if you're only reflecting a comment that's in your source; in any case, "some say" is a weasel phrase - who says it?
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately have to fail this as no response to above points after more than a month. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:09, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Patrick Cleburne/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Re-reviewing this article after having to fail its first GA nomination when points raised were not addressed, I'm satisfied that all earlier issues have been taken care of and the GA criteria are now met. Passed - well done all! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:34, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace[edit]

Article says Cleburne was born in Ovens, County Cork, Ireland (a small village 10 miles west of Cork City). I have located an early 20th century reference saying he was born in Queenstown, County Cork, (now known as Cobh) a town 15 miles south east of Cork City - see http://www.corkpastandpresent.ie/genealogy/pikescontemporarybiographies/contemporarybiographieso-y/biographies_hodges_complete_277_281.pdf Coolavokig (talk) 08:14, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patrick Cleburne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another External link[edit]

On Internet Archive, there is a book called 'Biographical sketches of Gen. Pat Cleburne and Gen. T. C. Hindman' by Charles Edward Nash. https://archive.org/details/biographicalsket00nash/page/n8/mode/2up

I don't know to add this item to 'External links'. Valetude (talk) 04:58, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Statue of Patrick Cleburne (Cleburne, Texas) into Patrick Cleburne[edit]

Is the statue worth its own page?   Kadzi   (talk) 12:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Patrick_Cleburne&oldid=1206717970"