Talk:Patterns in nature

Patterns in nature has been listed as one of the Mathematics good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 19, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 8, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that patterns in nature like the spirals of Aloe (pictured) are explained by mathematics, physics, chemistry, and natural selection all at once?

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

/Archive 1

Geographic tongue[edit]

Some cases of geographic tongue display cellular-automaton-like patterns. Not sure if they are to be classified as waves or spirals (they are dynamic the pattern move on the tongue on a day to day basis, in this case not unlike the rocks paper scissors automaton youtu.be/M4cV0nCIZoc?t=17s (can't link sorry).

It's another example of that same kind of pattern, as you say. This isn't a list; the task of the article is to introduce the main kinds of pattern. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:48, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Man-made objects.[edit]

Including man-made examples may be off topic for this article. This sets precedence for other man-made objects to be included, bloating this article. I added the circus tent image to the "Minimal surface" article. Interesting that the "Beijing's National Aquatics Center for the 2008 Olympic games" is not mentioned in the "Weaire–Phelan structure" article. I have no issue with mentioning "Weaire–Phelan structure" just the inclusion of examples. This is an editor's point of view. User-duck (talk) 20:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you don't mind the article's mentioning the W-P structure then there really isn't much reason to complain about having it illustrated. And if you wish to labour the point, if human architects and engineers are interested enough in natural patterns to choose to put them all over large buildings, that is certainly a relevant matter for an article on those patterns. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Scope of the Article?[edit]

Should the article be retitled "Visual patterns in nature" or should the scope be expanded to non-visible natural patterns, such as those that occur thoughout time or in some way that must be sensed without sight? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:602:C680:2960:651B:E86A:4EC8:B05B (talk) 21:40, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]