Talk:Paul Morley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article archive[edit]

i thought it would be valuable if any other editors would like to help me in creating an archive/links to various pieces on the web demonstrating the varied journalism of a number of music writers, including Morley. I was thinking about including the great writers of the seventies and eighties, such as Paul Morley, Simon Reynolds, Ian Penman, Nick Kent, Charles Shaar Murray etc. If anyone is interesyed i'd appreciate some help and guidance. Thanks. Ask me

In connection with single formats[edit]

Not exactly related to the request above, but I'm also trying to find some verifiable sources. I just read this biography on Allmusic that claims Morley may be "the person responsible for the multi-format/multi-part single phenomenon". I don't really know anything about Morley or ZTT Records, and the history section at single (music) is rather underwritten regarding that period of time (so any information that can be unearthed about this would make a useful addition). Does anyone know something about this or have any material to back it up with? –Unint 00:56, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. The ZTT label is reported as being the most egregious abuser of chart rules, keeping a single in the charts by issuing collectible editions and new remixes on multiple formats every few weeks. I don't know if it's verifiable that ZTT were the first to do this, although I think they were the most notorious. I've read that it led to some rule-tightening such as the 40-minute cap on a single's length (cf. The Orb's "Blue Room" 39m58s single) and limits on the number of items of each format that can be issued before disqualification from the UK singles charts. I'm sure there are references to back all of that up; I've seen these claims mentioned in multiple publications over the years. However I don't know of any references that would connect Morley himself to the phenomenon. Morley figured prominently into ZTT product packaging, but it could just as easily have been Trevor Horn or some combination of ZTT staff, for all I know.—mjb 13:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Frankie Goes To Hollywood t-shirts[edit]

Unconfirmed? If I recall correctly the slogan ones had (c) 1984 PAUL MORLEY small on the bottom right at the front whereas other Frankie Goes To Hollywood t-shirts (for instance with a record cover) had (c) 1984 ZTT. Scatterkeir 08:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MySpace link[edit]

Is it really Morley? --Merovingian {T C @} 06:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that none of the top 3 links have anything to do with Paul Morley —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.96.39 (talkcontribs)
Well, I'll be removing the MySpace one until a confirmation is available. --Merovingian - Talk 20:49, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Paulmorley.jpg[edit]

Image:Paulmorley.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Paul Morley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paul Morley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]