Jump to content

Talk:Paula Casey

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

[edit]

Notable?

[edit]

It seem like the only thing notable about her is that people have made accusations against her. This does not make her important enough for a biographical article on WP, even if all the accusations are true. Steve Dufour (talk) 16:20, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Paula Casey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article has poor grammar and style, and is not written in a disinterested, scholarly way. Instead, it reads like a poor attempt at a newspaper editorial. As a current student of Paula Casey's, I'm offended by the inaccuracies and clearly inflammatory language levelled against a professional. PLEASE EDIT THIS PAGE.

Last edited at 06:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 02:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

I made some mostly compositional edits at this page, having come here because of a mention of her at the article on Jim McDougall. The writing at that article was pathetic and the numerous flags of the articles by other editors have not received adequate responses. I'm assuming that the same editor may have worked on this article. It is substantially below Wikipedia's standards. Activist (talk) 19:08, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]