Jump to content

Talk:Paulamys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 4 October 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that no single vernacular name is the WP:COMMONNAME, and thus that the scientific name is a preferable article title. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 14:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Flores long-nosed ratPaulamys – This animal has no common name, this name has been only used twice in the academic literature [1], Paulamys is much more common and should be the default when there is no common name. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support. Scientific name is more commonly used than "Flores long-nosed rat" (or another vernacular name, "Paula's long-nosed rat"). There is unlikely to be a single English vernacular name that is more commonly used than the scientific name for any organism that: a) doesn't occur in an English speaking country, b) was relatively recently determined to be a distinct species by scientists, and c) which belongs to a group of organisms (rodents) considered uncharismatic by the general public. It is is not Wikipedia's place to put it's thumb on the scale and attempt to popularize a vernacular name that is not commonly used. Plantdrew (talk) 01:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.