Talk:Peel Art Gallery, Museum and Archives

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Libraries

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Proposed merge with History of the Peel Art Gallery, Museum and Archives[edit]

Very poorly sourced spinoff article about the history of a museum that doesn't need two separate articles. Very occasionally a spinoff like this might be warranted for institutions on the rarefied order of the Smithsonian or the Tate Modern or the Victoria and Albert, where the main article is extremely long and needs spinoffs for size management purposes, but a separate article about its history as a separate topic from the main article is not a thing that every museum in existence automatically gets to have. The main article is not long enough to need spinoffs like this. Bearcat (talk) 00:47, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merge, this is an unnecessary fork. PK T(alk) 12:58, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge Easily merged into the existing history section of the museum article and appropriate to do so. They're both short articles and there is no need for a fork. Meters (talk) 19:49, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support Merge per nom. ---- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 23:00, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Peel Art Gallery, Museum and Archives. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:01, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PAMA Art Gallery exhibitions[edit]

Why PAMA Art Gallery exhibitions has its own article is inexplicable considering the lack of reliable sources used there and the abundance of listing. This is not exactly encyclopedic material and only the most notable exhibitions should be kept. Mansheimer (talk) 08:54, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]