Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21

Pennsylvania Route 21 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 4, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
June 11, 2013	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / Pennsylvania Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Pennsylvania

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the Pennsylvania task force in January 2011.

Pennsylvania High‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pictures

Anyone have any pictures? If not, I guess I'll get some. Deigo (talk) 04:34, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
PA highways, is this a WP:RS? Also, could you use an actual direct link for the Google Map, and possibly use the {{cite map}} template for citation?
The PA highways site is used for a lot of Pennsylvania highway articles, so I figured it was reliable. Check it out and let me know if it'll work. If not I'll find something better. I'll work on the map links. Deigo (talk) 14:09, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Check the WP:RS noticeboard, and if they give it the green light, give me the perm link to the approval --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 14:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Someone said "maybe" Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. It's on the bottom. Deigo (talk) 15:04, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Please address the reference issues. On hold. --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:45, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pass --Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 03:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USRD GA audit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:01, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Pennsylvania Route 21/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Largely the article does not have broad coverage, the lead is too short, and relies on WP:SPS for the history. I will leave this up for a week for fixes to be made. --Rs chen 7754 06:59, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have redone the history using reliable sources and expanded the lead. Dough 48 72 01:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAR has been closed as keep. --Rs chen 7754 01:18, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]