This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
In that People Express is being reborn in 2012, that is the name that will begin to be searched for, and keeping this article as the main would be confusing to the common user. Recommend changing the name to "People Express Airlines (1980s)" and turning "People Express Airlines (2012)" into the main article, with a link back to this page. --DeknMike (talk) 14:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with that. —Compdude123 17:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. If any renames are done, this would be best brought for a full multipage move discussion at WP:RM. If a move for the old airline does gain consensus, then someone is going to need to manually update all of the links to the old airline that are hard coded in articles before the second move can be completed. Also using WP:RM would get the discussion in a single place. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Based on discussion on talk:People Express Airlines (2012), I have initiated action to merge the two and put this article's content as a 'history' section.--DeknMike (talk) 14:01, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is not an airline. Yet. Do we even know if it is going to be an airline or a scheduled public charter, that lease and borrows the certificated airlines services of other airlines and then slaps the name peoplexpress upon the ticket jackets. Additionally lauch plans have been postponed as of today... citing Peoplexpress leaders as saying launching the enterprise is more complicated then planned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.177.110.168 (talk) 19:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No! This article should not be renamed. The proper way to address any confusion in the article titles is with a hatnote (WP:HN), which is already in place. Senator2029 ★ Talk 12:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
So People Express is not being "reborn" in 2012. If they fly at all it will be in 2013. Worth mentioning in this article that there is a proposal to revive the name but until it is certified as an airline and actually flies, it is premature to have a separate article. Harry the Dog WOOF 15:06, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The articles should not be merged. I agree with Harry the Dog: it is a different company with different owners; only the brand name is the same. Further, the new airline isn't even operating yet—and may never. Let's not be hasty and foolish by pursuing this merger and rename nonsense any further. Senator2029 ★ Talk 12:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm removing the merger proposal templates. It's being "reborn" in the sense that the brand name is being reused, but that's about it. Separate articles for multiple uses of the same airline name are appropriate and consistent with how other similar cases have been handled on Wikipedia. See, for example: Pan American World Airways, Pan American Airways (1996–1998), and Pan American Airways (1998–2004). -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 16:29, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Anthony Appleyard, Sawol, Harry the Dirty Dog. I'm not exactly sure what you guys are trying to do with the reverts on multiple People Express Airline pages. Could you spell out what moves where and Appleywar or I can do moves. Bgwhite (talk) 07:26, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I was correcting a botched page move made without discussion by an inexperienced editor. The problem was that a lot of pages (like People Express) redirect to People Express Airlines, so circular redirects were being created by the original page mover. Restoring the original situation as quickly as possible seemed for the best, and since the page could not be easily moved cut and paste was the quickest way. I wasn't sure what Sawol was doing when he reverted my edits a few days later but he has now explained what he was trying to do and that's fine. The articles should be restored as People Express Airlines and People Express Airlines (2012-) unless there is consensus to change the names. Harry the Dog WOOF 08:01, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
People Express Airlines (1981–1987) is original. Wait for an ADMIN's action. At 18:14, 15 June 2014 AirportExpert moved this article with no discussion. We want to revert to the previous state. Sawol (talk) 08:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sawol, yes, but that doesn't appear to matter here. From my post above, do I understand correctly what moves where? Bgwhite (talk) 08:49, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:People Express Airlines (2012-) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 04:45, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]