Talk:Percy Henn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePercy Henn has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 6, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
March 6, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
December 20, 2007Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA nom[edit]

This one isn't quite up to GA standards yet, see my peer review for reasoning.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 16:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who assessed this but there is no way it is up to B-class, more like start.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 01:47, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted pending discussion. My understanding is that Henn is a fairly obscure figure for which little information is available. Thus, even though the article is short, everything seems to have been covered, and there are no key elements missing. I should think it would prove useful to the majority to people visiting in search of information on Henn. Hence B would seem most appropriate per Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment#Quality scale. Hesperian 02:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 08:12, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

legacy[edit]

There's a Henn close in Winthrop, Western Australia since winthrop is associated with UWA I wonder whether HEnn close is named after Percy Henn. The question is where to find such information to provide a cite for its inclusion in the article. Gnangarra 08:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess there would be a source in the UWA library... Seventy dot 03:55, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA[edit]

Feel free to resubmit it if you think it qualifies. I don't review the same articles twice, see what someone else thinks.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though I must say the concerns I noted were more the enough reason to fail it, GA criteria 1 is "well written" and GA criteria 4 is NPOV, both of which were concerns I noted on my peer review. I would definitely address those if I were the one resubmitting it, just my two cents.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
When I reviewed the GACriteria, I didn't think NPOV was a problem... but I'm looking for any suggestion. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:21, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Those weasel words was all I noted...anyway, on that, mostly the prose was my concern, I have made a couple additional notes on the peer review. Like I said I won't be the one reviewing it next time (because I thnk articles get better and better the more eyes that look at them) but I am willing to point out anything I notice, I won't mess with geographic locales, promise, I'll just mention if something is confusing here or on the review page. : )A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Resubmission[edit]

I am relisting the article for GA review. Auroranorth (WikiDesk) 11:26, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Version 0.7[edit]

This article falls outside the scope of this next release. However, it will be automatically considered for later, larger releases. Walkerma 04:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated peer review 1[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Auroranorth (!) 10:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have completed the suggestions shown here. Auroranorth (!) 10:55, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GAR[edit]

This article is being brought to WP:GAR. Auroranorth (!) 11:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article: pass[edit]

It meets the criteria so it gets a pass, but there are a two things I would like to see work on:

  • Grammatical and MoS errors. I corrected as many as I saw going through, but keep an eye out for proper formatting and writing in this article.
  • It is a very short article. It doesn't appear to omit anything major, but I would definitely like to see more detailed content.

Good job. Let me know if there are any problems or questions. Dylan (talk) 05:58, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Percy Henn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Percy_Henn&oldid=1198499553"