Talk:Perrey and Kingsley

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Release date for "The Essential Perrey & Kingsley"[edit]

This was released on LP in 1975 at the latest, not in 1991. http://www.discogs.com/Perrey-Kingsley-The-Essential-Perrey-Kingsley/release/784731 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.237.195.62 (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was actually released in 1988, not in 1975, see The Essential Perrey & Kingsley which is a more reliable site than discogs. --Germanico5468504 (talk) 21:37, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The first?[edit]

"They were the first to create enjoyable electronic music for the general public."

Is there a source for this? Certainly there were some early efforts by the musicians of the BBC Radiophonic Workshop around then. Also, "enjoyable" seems subjective, although P&K definitely falls under easy listening. — Hex (❝?!❞) 20:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence certainly sounds subjective and has no place in a serious article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.224.200.245 (talk) 09:50, 12 October 2006

In addition to the fact that Perrey, (member of the duet) and other composers before the 60s composed electronic music songs. In fact Perrey and Kingsley were electronic musicians.--Germanico5468504 (talk) 20:08, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Other stuff[edit]

he did some stuff with luke vibert recently. maybe it's not too important — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.22.135.187 (talk) 08:35, 28 October 2008‎

Horrible.[edit]

I’m sorry, but this article reads horribly. Some sentences start with the the words “in fact” or “About the time when”. I’m going to try to start cleaning this up, it reads like a fan wrote it. 2601:483:101:86B5:7CE3:F0B3:CC3C:809B (talk) 00:56, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Currently it is already more or less well written.--Germanico5468504 (talk) 23:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]