Talk:Peter de Maulay/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:11, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A well-written article. I have only a few comments to make: Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • In Early life:
  • where he soon became a close advisor of the king Add a citation at the end of this.
  • There is no need for a citation on this phrase, since it's covered by the citation at the end of the next sentence. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can we add why exactly he should be an "evil" counsellor?
  • We don't know why Roger of Wendover considered him such. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • He married in 1214 Isabella Better write In 1214 he married Isabella
  • Thornham had died in 1211 How can the place die? Should this be "Robert" instead?
  • It's not unusual to refer to people in this time period by their "location" name but I've changed it. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • In Under Henry III:
  • Henry III is a duplicate link
  • The earlier link is to "Prince Henry" so I've retained this link in case people don't at first make the connection. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • which occurred on 17 May Add the year.
  • In Treason accusations:
  • In July Peter des Roches returned to England and in late July was instrumental in the clearing of Maulay from the charges of treason
  • What did you have concerns about with this? Looks like you started a thought and then never finished it. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • In Upavon case:
  • Has Upavon been linked anywhere?
  • If you mean in this article, yes, it was linked in "Early life" when we discuss de Maulay receiving it. If you mean is there an article about the medieval dispute over Upavon, I'm not aware of any. (And it would be difficult to justify on GNG grounds) Ealdgyth - Talk 12:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Images: Are you sure we can use no images in the article? How about a image of Henry III?
  • There really isn't a need for purely decorative images. Ealdgyth - Talk 12:59, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should be all. Good luck! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 10:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response Ealdgyth, I see no more issues with the article. This is ready for promotion. A fantastic job!