Talk:Peter of Canterbury/GA1
Appearance
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I did a quick copy edit, please check. OK, some nitpicks now
- Note 2 (d. 605x11) - I don't understand what this means
- so he probably died after that.- Reads a bit oddly, perhaps after that date?
- Career - do saints/bishops have careers? Life maybe, but no big deal
- buried hastily nearby, but Bede reports that after a light illuminated the grave every night, the locals realised Peter was a saint and exhumed him and buried him again in Boulogne. - perhaps the second "buried" could be "re-interred"?
- Some more inelegant repetition: "later" twice in one sentence, "convert" and "converted" in another
- As a member of the Gregorian mission, it is presumed that Peter was native of Italy. - not obvious to me, perhaps clearer as It is presumed that Peter was native of Italy, like the other members of the Gregorian mission.
- Laurence, another of the missionaries, perhaps fellow-missionary Lawrence?
- It is possible that he died on his return from the Council of Paris - perhaps during is clearer
- confirmed in 1915. I have no idea how saints are accredited. Can this be expanded to clarify? Eg ...by Pope Fred VI or ...at the Conclave of Reykjavik'
- Confirmed (it's linked the relevant part of canonization) means that although his sainthood predates the offical canonization process, in 1915 they went back and did some paperwork and said "Yeah, he'd make saint now even with the paperwork requirements". I don't know who did the confirmation though. Just that it happened in 1915. Ealdgyth - Talk 17:21, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
I suspect that there is no image of this guy, is it worth adding a pic of the abbey? jimfbleak (talk) 11:20, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Formal bit
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Many more priests? jimfbleak (talk) 06:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)