Talk:Peter van Inwagen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Philosophy: Philosophers / Metaphysics / Ethics / Religion / Analytic / Contemporary Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Metaphysics
	Ethics
	Philosophy of religion
	Analytic philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

need work

Someone should improve this article. --

I agree this page needs a lot of work. --Tim

This does not even begin to cover his work and seems to dwell on one single lesser known argument. Van Inwagen is famous for the consequence argument

I added Robert Kane's assessment of the importance of van Inwagen's Consequence Argument. I also added his Mind Argument Cmsreview (talk) 15:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also added van Inwagen's recent position that "Free will remains a mystery" - especially his doubts about random chance (indeterminism) causing actions. May we now remove the two warnings? Cmsreview (talk) 16:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not having received any comments from other "watchers" I have removed the "unsourced" and "unencyclopedic warnings." Cmsreview (talk) 17:24, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Incoherence of Free Will?

Inwagen doesn't claim free will is incoherent. This is a misunderstanding of the article. Inwagen tries to describe the problem of free will by showing that it SEEMS like its incompatible with both determinism and indeterminism, and at the same time the denial of free will SEEMS to be incompatible with the notion of moral responsibility. His conclusion is that there must a mistake in one of those arguments ( his bet is on the incompatibility with indeterminism), not that free will is incoherent. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.124.182 (talk) 22:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the exact same thing (13 years after you) and just removed the quotation and that inaccurate/misleading paraphrasing of it. Alecnotalex (talk) 04:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Peter van Inwagen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:41, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]