Jump to content

Talk:Petit Trianon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconIntertranswiki/OKA
WikiProject iconThis article has been created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association. See the OKA task force page of WikiProject Intertranswiki.WikiProject icon

[Untitled]

[edit]

Removed section containing a ghost story/paranormal event which has little to do with the history of this building. If anyone thinks it should be there, recover it from the history and perhaps link it to a "Legends of Versaille" or "Ghost Stories of Versailles" article.

this is very poorly written. 69.203.10.232 (talk) 02:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that the main page today has a story about the haunting at Petit Trianon it seems strange that the page on this place has no mention of the ghosts! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.205.224.155 (talk) 12:25, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have readded the Moberly-Jourdain incident, this article definetly should mention this here. Gryffindor 12:46, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the article should mention the Moberly-Jourdain incident, as the claim has generated a significant body of work, but IMO what was in the article seemed very biased towards a supernatural explanation, with the claim that no satisfactory explanation has been found. Surely an explanation of a hoax would be sufficient for many people. I have made some changes in an attempt to remedy this, but I have no doubt that the phrasing could be improved. 92.234.23.179 (talk) 01:34, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moberly-Jourdain incident has been added as a See also item.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 12:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The long narrative about Antoinette using the Petit Trianon as a place of solitary respite seems wholly inaccurate. I turned up a few books in Google books that describe lavish parties and much socializing away form the court. See page 1-2 of the Arnott reference for examples. Not sure how to fix this large mess of an article. 198.58.150.106 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 07:42, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The French version of this page is up for translation into English. I assume that the two pages will be merged. Laluneestjolie (talk) 22:46, 30 November 2015 (UTC)laluneestjolie 17:46, 30 November 2013 (EST)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Petit Trianon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:37, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Château du Petit Trianon section

[edit]

@Asilvering Hi, thanks for the message in my talk page! I created a section for the Château in the Petit Trianon article! Let me know if everything is okay and keep up with the good work.

Beatrizsborges (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]