Talk:Pg. 99

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Articles for Deletion debate[edit]

This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 20:37, 12 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Addition[edit]

I have added to this page. Please amend it because it is dire.
--Borbetomagus 14:27, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Members[edit]

How does a screamo band have 14 members? Someone? 

                  Maybe you should listen to them and find out, they are chaotic.

From their Myspace:

"We were just a group of friends who all wanted to play music and try to make our lives more incredible. We formed as a 6 piece in the Winter of 1998 and later became an 8 piece."

I've heard from people in other bands who toured with pg. 99 that they had many more than 8 members at times. So 14 members doesn't seem too unreasonable if you give them a listen. Bungoman (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going through my records and inserted in Document #7 was a little baseball card thing made by Magic Bullet Records and on it it says "More of a collective than a traditional band. The makeup of pg.99 can range anywhere from five to theoretically twenty members at any given time." I would take that to mean that while they didn't always play with that many people at times they did even if the people weren't actually members of the band itself. 71.170.2.224 (talk) 07:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Violent Shows?[edit]

I've never heard of anything about Pg.99 needing emergency personell, where the hell did this come from? -EmoAddict15 5:53 PM, 25 February 2007 (EST)

Darkest Hour[edit]

Some members of Pg. 99 supposedly went on to form Darkest Hour, but I'm not sure which ones. I also mentioned this on the Darkest Hour discussion page.--Relyt22 21:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: No members of Pg.99 formed Darkest Hour. Pg.99 was formed in 1999, where as Darkest Hour was formed in 1999, four years later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.222.239 (talk) 07:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case anyone is reading this over 6 months late, this is not true. I'm pretty sure pg. 99 did not share any members with Darkest Hour, and Darkest Hour was a band long before pg. 99. However, Ryan Parrish is the drummer of Darkest Hour, and he was also the first drummer of City of Caterpillar who played with and shared members with pg. 99. Maybe that is the connection you were looking for?-Andrew c [talk] 00:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the person who did the artwork for documents 7, 8, and 12 (as well as a few t-shirt designs) did the artwork for some darkest hour albums. I met the guy once, I wish I could remember his name. I'm not sure if he was in pg. 99 or just a friend of the band. Bungoman (talk) 08:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard that it was Chris Taylor, who was in the band, but I don't know of any sources and I'm not positive about it.Punkrockrunner (talk) 00:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)punkrockrunner[reply]

Additional Album Info?[edit]

I have more information on most of their albums such as tracklists/tracktimes and pressing info. Would it be appropriate to expand their release section to include such information? I don't have online sources for the info, so that's one reason to be hesitant. Also I'm not sure pg. 99's releases meet the notability guidelines. There's a pretty big pg. 99 following still, but it's kind of a niche within a niche. I do know that to people into pg. 99 that kind of information would be relevant. But, I've never seen pressing info on any other artists page and the guidelines don't mention it so kinda seems like it's a no no. Anyone have thoughts on this? Given the sheer number of releases pg. 99 had in such a short time I personally think expanding the information a little would be a good idea. Bungoman (talk) 08:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If sources could be found, more info should definitely be added. The article is so small. A section about the musical style or releases would be a good place to start I guess.Punkrockrunner (talk) 00:53, 22 August 2008 (UTC)punkrockrunner[reply]

Merge[edit]

Per WP:NALBUM, there is no good reason for separate articles  Chzz  ►  00:42, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would a discography page better suit, or should the content be merged into this page's discography? Chubbles (talk) 01:08, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pg. 99. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pg._99&oldid=1209738108"